Monday, July 30, 2012

Questions for 7/31 -- EN 190 Summer II 2012


Good evening!

Since we have class tomorrow, I'd like to send you the reading and questions as quickly as possible.  We are starting a new genre (poetry), so I expect to see everyone.  I do realize that it is still Ramadan, and I appreciate those of you who have let me know about your obligations!

 Here is the reading for Tuesday:

 chapters 11 and 12 (including poems) (541-569)

We looked at scenes from The Dumb Waiter:

Feel free to watch as much as you can.

Here is a link to Nosferatu: 

For more information about the film, see this entry:
http://worldlit2.multiply.com/journal/item/154/Nosferatu-1922

You may enjoy seeing a little bit about silent comedy:

Some of you may enjoy seeing scenes from the 1979 Nosferatu:

And these are the questions for your journal:

-- What do the scenes from The Dumb Waiter add to your understanding of drama?

-- Compare these scenes to other scenes from other "gangster" movies or TV shows.  

-- Discuss Ben and Gus' relationship.  What is the balance of power between them?

-- Why are the strange orders coming down on the dumbwaiter?  What is Pinter trying to do here?

-- Compare the scenes to the staged version we saw on Saturday.

-- Ought our editors include The Dumb Waiter in the next edition of their anthology?  Why?  Why not?

-- Discuss the ending of Nosferatu (1922).  Why does Ellen sacrifice herself?

-- Discuss Nosferatu in its historical context (WWI, Germany's hyperinflation, the assassination of Walther Rathenau, the minister of foreign affairs and a Jewish man).

-- Discuss Nosferatu as a horror film.

-- Compare the two different versions of Nosferatu.

-- How does Murnau draw on film technology in Nosferatu?

-- Discuss the setting of Nosferatu.

-- What comes to mind when you think about poetry? Why?

-- If poetry does not have rhyme or meter or structure, how do you know whether or not it is any good?  (Feel free to refer to one of the poems in ch. 12.)

-- Apply Denise Levertov's ideas in "Some Notes On Organic Form" to poetry.

-- What does depend on the red wheelbarrow?

-- Which images stand out for you in one of the poems in ch. 12?  Why?

-- Which word choices stand out for you in one of the poems in ch. 12?  Why?

-- If you have studied literature in another language, how does that literature define poetry?

I'm looking forward to hearing what you have to say!

Dr. Szlyk

Below are pictures from the Nazis' exhibition of "degenerate art."

 Below are pictures from the exhibition itself:

Here is another:

Starting the Second Half of the Journal in EN 190

 
Above is a picture of F.W. Murnau, the director of Nosferatu.  I hope that the image below stays!


Good morning :)

I'm glad that you enjoyed the snacks last night, and I hope that your work is coming along well.

Since we are coming through a particularly busy stretch, I am not assigning any reading for Monday although we will be discussing poetry as well as Nosferatu.

Tuesday's reading will be  chapters 11 and 12 (including poems) (541-569).

Here is a link to Nosferatu: 

For more information about the film, see this entry:
http://worldlit2.multiply.com/journal/item/154/Nosferatu-1922

You may enjoy seeing a little bit about silent comedy:

I am also sending you a PowerPoint on vampires, done by students in a section of EN 202.

I will try to keep the questions to a (relative) minimum:

-- If English is *not* your first language, what was it like to watch Nosferatu?

-- How may Nosferatu have influenced today's horror movies and/or vampire movies & TV shows?

-- How is Nosferatu different from today's vampire?

-- What is film like without a soundtrack?  Is it literature?  Or is it art?

-- Discuss the characters in the film.  Are they round?  flat?  Are they archetypes?  Why?  Why not?

-- Discuss the setting in the film.

-- What would seem to be the theme of the film?

-- What are some symbols in the film?  How do they make the film more interesting?

-- How may folktales such as "Godfather Death" have influenced Nosferatu?

Here are some questions about the play for those of you who will attend Saturday's performance:

-- What was it like for you to watch a live performance?

-- Compare the act of watching a live performance to the act of watching a film of a performance.

-- What did the performance add to your understanding of Trifles?

-- Should we continue to perform and/or read Glaspell's play?

Keep up the good work, everyone!

Dr. Szlyk

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Questions for 7/24 -- EN 190 Summer II 2012

 



Above are pictures of the Spokane Indian Reservation in Washington state.  (Sherman Alexie is part Spokane and part Couer d'Alene.)


Good evening :)

While I am still online, I'd like to send a few questions in case you need an entry or two for your journal.  Writing a journal entry is a good way to study for the midterm.  However, you may also post the draft of your paper for Friday as your entry.

You may recognize some of these questions from our class discussion.

-- what is Sherman Alexie trying to tell us about being Native American?

-- what do we learn about Victor, Thomas, and Junior from each of Alexie's stories?

-- what do we learn about the reservation from these stories?

-- discuss Alexie's use of first person.

-- discuss his use of third person

-- discuss his use of flashbacks and/or chronology

-- how do the parts of his stories fit together?

-- what is Alexie trying to tell us about being human?

-- why read stories about people who are disadvantaged?

I'm looking forward to seeing what you have to say!

Dr. Szlyk

Monday, July 23, 2012

Questions for 7/23 -- EN 190 Summer II 2012




Above is a picture of a house near where "Bad Neighbors" is set.  I believe that 1400 8th NW would be in the Shaw neighborhood.




Good evening :)

Just a reminder that our midterm is Thursday, the second paper and journals are due Friday, and the play is Saturday.  If you weren't sure whether or not you'd attend, please let me know what you've decided.  Thank you!

For tomorrow, we will read Sherman Alexie's three stories ("This is What It Means," "The Lone Ranger," and "Somebody") and apply what we've learned about the elements of fiction.  We may also discuss "The Christmas Pies."

Here are a few questions for you:

 -- Apply one of the elements we've discussed to one of our readings for tomorrow.  

-- Apply Burke's Motives to one of our readings for tomorrow or to one of our short stories.  The five parts of this method follow:  act (what happened), actor (who performed the act), scene (where/when), agency (how -- narration & style), and motives (why--author & characters).

-- In your opinion, which is the most interesting element of fiction?  why?

-- Compare two of the stories we've discussed or read.  How are they different?  How are they similar?  How do they shed light on each other?

-- Which trends do you see emerging in our examination of fiction?  why?

-- Of the stories we've read, which would be worth staging?  why?  How would it/they be different?

-- How do our authors work with archetypes (symbols that have meaning across culture)?  How do they make them interesting to you as a reader?

-- Do you prefer symbols to be surprising and unique or to be universal?    Why?

-- How do symbols help you enjoy literature?

-- How do our authors work with literary symbols (surprising and different symbols)?  How do these symbols make you look at the world or the story in a new way?

-- How do our authors use word choices or diction to create character and setting and/or make the narrative more believable?  

-- How do our authors use sentence structure and/or rhythm to keep you interested?

-- How do our authors use irony?

-- How do our authors use dialogue?

See you in class!

Dr. Szlyk

Friday, July 20, 2012

Study Guide for Midterm -- pt. 3 -- EN 190 -- Summer II 2012

I hope that this photo stays on this blog!  It's from the 1985 movie Smooth Talk that is based on "Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?" with Laura Dern and 
Treat Williams.  Here is a clip from the film:

And the review is here:  


I'll start with a bit about orality.  Orality refers to characteristics of a culture before writing is invented.  Some characteristics are stories that begin in medias res (the middle of things), a reliance on episodes rather than a narrative arc, a reliance on externals and action rather than on interiority, performance, improvisation, and key words like "wine dark sea" and "dawn's rosy fingers."  Relevant figures are Milman Parry (researcher) and Father Walter J. Ong (theorist).

These terms are relevant to fiction:

short story
novella -- 50 to 100 pp.
novel -- over 100 pp.
graphic fiction
genre fiction

plot--
plot vs. story
narrative arc
flashback
foreshadowing
conflict (person vs. person, person vs. self, person vs. society, person vs. nature)
epiphany
exposition
chronological order
reverse chronological order

character -- 
round vs. flat (E.M. Forster)
dynamic vs. static
ways of depicting character: telling, showing, saying, thinking
interiority
protagonist
antagonist
minor

point of view
narrator
narrative
3rd person (omniscient, limited, central consciousness)
stream of consciousness
2nd person (Bright Lights, Big City)
But there are more examples of this trick:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-person_narrative
1st person (naive, reliable, omniscient)

theme -- an implied thesis statement (subject + predicate) assigned by the reader (not the writer); as a result, a work may have more than one theme!
abstraction and limitations of theme

setting -- includes place, time, circumstance

symbol -- is concrete and meaningful...may be categorized as private, literary, conventional or traditional, cliche, or archetypal

style -- diction, sentence structure, rhythm, voice

irony

tone

motives: act, actor, scene, agency, motives

Study Guide for Midterm -- pt. 2 -- EN 190 -- Summer II 2012

As a change of pace, since we have so many pictures of Brooklyn and the theater, I thought I'd post a picture of LA.  Here is a more idyllic picture, reflecting what older people may think of when they hear about LA or California.

On to the terms and links!

drama vs. theater 

drama -- playwright, script, characters, stage directions, setting, plot

theater -- director, actor, audience, performance, set, sound, lighting

 As promised, here is a link to Erikson's stages of development.  
 
http://fac.hsu.edu/langlet/lectures/dev/Erikson/erik_erikson.htm

You may also find Kohlberg's theory interesting as well:

Michael Morrison provides a Christian perspective on development:

Or is Carol Gilligan's theory more appropriate to Linda?
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/huff/classes/handbook/Gilligan.html

Other approaches to literature include formalist (focusing on elements of the text), historical, economic, gender (male OR female), racial, and ethnic.

Ways of categorizing literature include genre, historical period, language, nation, culture (including academic or youth), and theme.


Here is my entry on Miller's life and career:
You may also find this interview to be interesting:

For more information about DoaS' time and place, see this entry:

Take a look at other versions of DoaS:
The latest version is here:  http://www.broadway.com/shows/death-salesman/

To be fair, you ought to look at the reviews, too:


And here is the link to the entry on the Beijing production:


For more information about Trifles, see this entry:

Below is a picture of Glaspell's Provincetown Theater in NYC.

After a scare in 2008, it is still open:

Questions for 7/23 -- EN 190 Summer II 2012



 
Good afternoon :)

I hope that the extended responses are coming along well.  Please let me know if you have questions or concerns about them this weekend.

For Monday, we will be reading chapters 6 and 7, focusing on setting and symbol as well as style, irony, and tone.  On Tuesday, we may look at Sherman Alexie's stories.  We will finish up fiction and begin watching Nosferatu then.  

Here is a link to "Why I Live at the P.O.":

You may read some of Bright Lights, Big City here:

Here are a few more questions for your journal and perhaps the next extended response:

-- what purpose does fiction serve?  why is it worth reading?

-- which short story has been your favorite so far?  why?

-- what makes a narrator reliable?

-- why might an author choose to give a story an unreliable narrator?

-- of the short stories we've read, which narrators could be unreliable?  why?

-- discuss the impact of Bright Lights, Big City's second person narration
Here is the beginning of the movie starring Michael J. Fox:

-- discuss the impact of a narrator's language.  Do you prefer him/her to use standard English?  Do you prefer him/her to use more colorful or less formal language?  Which types of language do you trust more?  Why?  Why not?

-- Discuss the impact of a story's setting (time and place).  Why does it matter when/where a story is set?

-- Have you been to any of the settings in the stories we've read so far?  What is it it like for you to read these stories and revisit these settings?

-- What is it like for you to read about places that are very much unlike Montgomery County?

-- What is it like for you to read stories set in the distant or not-so-distant past?

--  Discuss the impact of imagery in one of the stories we've read or are reading this weekend.

-- Discuss the impact of conventional, allegorical, or unconventional symbolism in one of the stories we've read or are reading.

-- Which is the most interesting symbol you've encountered in the stories we've read or are reading?  why?

-- Which is the most interesting symbol you've encountered outside of our class?  why?

-- Discuss a symbol from a culture that is not mainstream American.

-- Compare "Today's Demon: Magic" and "The Christmas Pies" as fiction and as graphic fiction.

-- Which other graphic fiction belongs in our anthology?  why?

-- What is your definition of literature?  Which works fit?  Which do not?  Why?
(Note that at one point plays were not considered to be literature and that the Bodleian library did not originally contain play scripts, even Shakespeare's.)

-- How would you expand on someone's point from Thursday's discussions?

I look forward to seeing and hearing what you have to say!

Dr. Szlyk
 

Thursday, July 19, 2012

Study Guide for Midterm -- pt. 1 -- EN 190 -- Summer II 2012































Above is an image from the Orange Tree Theatre (UK)'s evening of short plays by Susan Glaspell.  For more information about this production, see these links:


But more importantly, which readings/viewings will be on our midterm (July 27)?

Death of a Salesman -- text, DVD of 1985 production, and the following clips:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brdbM9YSCq4 (2000, with Brian Dennehy)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnTqlxajQ5Q (1996, BBC, with Warren Mitchell)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nYKpvtYPG4 (2008, DC's own Arena Stage)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJNaEDrtjug (2009, with Charles S. Dutton)

Trifles -- text and the following clips  
Below are links to the videos we watched.  If you have more patience with opera, you may start here:

Otherwise, these are the movies:

"A Jury of Her Peers" is here:

Here is one clip from one version of Sophie Treadwell's Machinal:


"Love in L.A."

"Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?"

"The House on Mango Street"

"Everyday Use"

"Why I Live at the P.O." -- http://art-bin.com/art/or_weltypostoff.html



I wouldn't mind living at the Gulfport, MS P.O. below!

 Readings continue below:

"Hills Like White Elephants"

"The Things They Carried"

"Bad Neighbors"

"The Lesson"

"This is What It Means to Say Phoenix, Arizona"

"The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven"

"The Christmas Pies"

Here are clips from Smoke Signals that we watched:

We also watched the following video of a Native American storyteller:

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Questions for 7/19 -- EN 190 Summer II 2012



Good evening :)

Tonight we began our exploration of fiction, focusing on plot and character but also covering other aspects.  It was a fine beginning!  For Thursday, we will move on to point of view and theme.  

These are our readings:  chapter 5 (including stories) (98-134) and “Girl” (397-8) as well as “Dinner with Dr. Aziz.”  One of our stories will be Lynda Barry's "Today's Demon: Magic," a work of graphic fiction.

Before I go onto the questions, here are links to information about MLA:

Here are a few more questions for your journal:

-- how is your extended journal entry on drama/theater coming along?  (Feel free to post your draft at Multiply.)

-- how would you apply Erikson, Kohlberg, or Gilligan's theory to the short stories we've read so far?  
You may also find Piaget's theory to be useful:

-- choose one of the terms we discussed tonight and then use it to examine one of the short stories we've read so far.  (Feel free to choose one of the stories from ch. 5, "Girl," or "Dinner with Dr. Aziz.")

-- do you believe that people can change?  why?  why not?

-- do you believe that a person's character is consistent?  why?  why not?

-- how does your experience help you interpret any of the short stories we've read so far?

-- How might doing research on history, economics, gender, ethnicity, or literature help you understand one of our short stories more?  

-- Today we looked at stories in the third person.  How does fiction change when you read a story in the first person (I, me, mine)?  Which person do you prefer?  Why?

-- How would ch. 4's stories change if they were told in the first person?

-- discuss the reliability of narrators.

-- Choose a story we've read.  What is its theme?  How is the theme different from a director's central idea?

-- How does the author's gender affect the stories we've read?  

--  Is "Girl" a short story?  why?  why not?

-- Is "Today's Demon: Magic" typical of the graphic fiction you've read?  why?  why not?

-- Which graphic fiction ought to be studied in EN 190 and other English classes?

-- Is graphic fiction literature?  why?  why not?

-- how do you define literary fiction?

-- do you read "genre" fiction (i.e., mysteries, SF, romances, fan fiction)?  should these stories be studied in En 190?

-- how did our brief exploration of storytelling help you understand fiction more?  (here is a link to the video that we watched:  

-- what purpose does literary fiction serve?

See you in class!

Dr. Szlyk 

Questions for 7/17 -- EN 190 Summer II 2012


Good evening :)

Tomorrow night we will be moving onto fiction.  Here are our readings:

In our textbook, chapters 3 & 4 (including stories) (55-95) plus “Godfather Death” and “Coyote and Eagle Visit the Land of the Dead.

For "Godfather Death," see this link:

For "Coyote and Eagle Visit the Land of the Dead," see this link:

Below are links to the videos we watched.  If you have more patience with opera, you may start here:

Otherwise, these are the movies:

"A Jury of Her Peers" is here:

Here is one clip from one version of Sophie Treadwell's Machinal:

And these are the questions for your journal:

-- what would you like to present on?  how will it shed light on literature?  when would you like to give your presentation?  

-- which response would you like to expand on for the first paper?  why?

-- what do you expect to see on the midterm?  (Note that the midterm and final includes only what we cover in class.)

-- what purpose does the drama serve?  what purpose does theater serve?  why might a playwright or director choose to use more experimental and less realistic techniques?  why might a playwright or director choose to adhere to realism?

-- could a play be worth reading if it is no longer being performed?  why?  why not?

-- in your opinion, which is the most important element of fiction?  why?

-- how is fiction different from drama?  how is it similar?

-- compare how dramatists convey character with the ways that writers of short stories do.

-- compare how dramatists convey setting with the ways that writers of short stories do.

-- compare how dramatists and writers of fiction use plot (including foreshadowing and flashbacks)

-- how are the folktales ("Godfather Death" and "Coyote and Eagle") different from the literary short stories?  how are they similar?

-- describe Death, the father, the godson, Coyote, and Eagle as characters

-- what do we really know about Jake or Mariana in "Love in LA" or Connie & Arnold Friend in "Where are you going..."

-- how do you feel about the ending of Trifles?

-- how do you feel about the ending of "Love in L.A." or the ending of "Where are you going...?"

-- do you feel that you have enough background in "Love in L.A." ?  why?  why not?

-- why does Joyce Carol Oates dedicate her story to Bob Dylan?  (if you don't know who he is, here are some videos for you:



See you in class!  Just a reminder that I do expect you to be there.

Dr. Szlyk

Questions for 7/16 -- EN 190 Summer II 2012

 
In the picture above from the 2000 revival, Ben is in white.  

Good evening :)

I'm glad that we were able to have lively discussion tonight--and to watch some of the other versions of DoaS.  Here is a link to the entry with the various videos that we saw:


The latest version is here:  http://www.broadway.com/shows/death-salesman/

You may also be interested in reading various reviews:

Here are reviews of the recent version:

And these are links to the theories we went over:
Also, here is a link to a page with information about Erikson's theory of development:

You may also find Kohlberg's theory interesting as well:

Michael Morrison provides a Christian perspective on development:

Finally, here are a few questions for you.

Where does the 1985 version of DoaS differ from Miller's text?  Why is this difference important?  How does it help you understand the play more fully?

Where do the other versions that we looked at differ from Miller's text?

Where are they similar to his text?

Take a look at the 1951 version of DoaS.  How does it differ from the 1985 version?

What surprised you about reading the reviews?  How do opinions vary?

What role does Linda play in DoaS?  Why?  Is it positive or negative?

Discuss the more recent portrayals of her character.

Why do the Woman and Ben wear white in the 1985 version?

How do the various theories we discussed help you understand DoaS?

How might doing research on history, economics, gender, or the theater help you understand DoaS more?

How might a female director interpret DoaS?

How did the discussion help you understand DoaS?

What would you have liked to contribute if you had had more time?

Which question would you like to expand for the paper?

Moving on to Trifles, our next reading....

how do the men and women view each other?

why do the women handle the evidence the way that they do?

how is Glaspell's vision specifically feminine or feminist?

what role does setting play in Trifles?

how is Trifles' world different from our own?  how is it similar?

is this play worth continuing to stage?

I'm interested in seeing what you think of it!

Dr. Szlyk

Questions for 7/12 -- EN 190 Summer II 2012


The picture above is from the 2012 revival of Death of a Salesman.  Don't know why it's in black and white, though.  
Good evening :)

I'm glad to see that we finished up today's class with a lively discussion of Biff's response to his father's betrayal.  Feel free to explore this topic further in your journal and perhaps even in your extended response.  Remember that as long as you can support your argument through the text and performance, you can make your point, no matter what it is.

For Thursday, let's finish up Death of a Salesman.

Also, here is a link to a page with information about Erikson's theory of development:

You may also find Kohlberg's theory interesting as well:

Michael Morrison provides a Christian perspective on development:

How would you apply any of these theories to the characters in Death of a Salesman?  (Note that Miller was not Christian.)

Now that more and more of you are on Multiply, I thought I'd include some questions that are connected to my past entries:

Here is my entry on Miller's life and career:
You may also find this interview to be interesting:

What light does this information shed on DoaS?  on Miller's characters? on his intentions for his play?  or on Miller himself?

For more information about DoaS' time and place, see this entry:
You may enjoy reading about modern-day Brooklyn:

How does this information help you understand DoaS, its characters, and its story in more depth?  

What does it mean for DoaS to be set in Brooklyn?

If you were to adapt DoaS so that it was set in 2012, what would you change?  why?

Take a look at other versions of DoaS:
The latest version is here:  http://www.broadway.com/shows/death-salesman/
How are they different from the 1985 version?  How are they similar?  Which version deserves to be made into a full-length movie for PBS or HBO?

What light do they shed on your understanding of DoaS?

How much should directors change plays?  Why?  Why not?

To be fair, you ought to look at the reviews, too:


When do critics believe that a production is successful?  When do they believe that it is a failure?  Are these critics fair?  Why?  Why not?

And here is the link to the entry on the Beijing production:


What surprised you about this production?  Why?  

What is the difference between generic and universal?

Finally, I am a little concerned about attendance.  Attendance is important!


I'm looking forward to seeing what you have to say!

Dr. Szlyk

First Set of Questions (Summer II 2012)



Good evening :)

I enjoyed meeting everyone tonight and look forward to working with you this summer!  Hope you are enjoying the cooler weather, too.

I've just sent you invitations.  Check your spam folders if you do not see your invitation right away.  MC has a particularly good spam filter. 

Also, here is the link to information about Unexpected Stage Company's production of Trifles:

If we can get at least ten people, each ticket will be only $7.  And the director assures me that there is enough parking.

Which date works better for you:  Saturday July 28 at 7:30 or Saturday August 4 at 7:30?

Finally, here are questions for your journal:

-- Based on what you've seen so far in the 1985 version of Death of a Salesman, what seems to be the central idea of this production?  Why?

-- How has watching this DVD helped you read Miller's play?

-- How has watching this DVD helped you understand Willy's character, his relationship to the rest of his family, or his life & times?

-- How has reading Miller's play helped you think about the DVD? 

-- What seems to be the play's theme?

-- How have Miller's stage directions helped you understand his play and/or Willy and his family?

-- How would you "diagnose" Willy?  Why?  Can we diagnose a fictional character?  Why?  Why not?  Should we?  (Note that psychoanalytic criticism is only one type of criticism.)
 
-- But as promised, here is a link to Erikson's stages of development.  
http://honolulu.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/guidebk/teachtip/erikson.htm
Use these stages of development to talk about Willy, Linda, Biff, and Happy.  Feel free to talk about Charlie and Bernard as well.
Or is Carol Gilligan's theory more appropriate to Linda?
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/huff/classes/handbook/Gilligan.html

-- Discuss the body language in the film.  How does it help you understand Miller's play more?

-- Discuss the DVD as a film.  How does the director use elements of film to get his points across?

-- How does "the grayness of life" pertain to DoaS?

-- How is DoaS a timeless play?

-- How is it a timely play?

-- How is this play a historical curiosity?

Perhaps one of these questions will lead to your first expanded journal entry!

See you tomorrow,

Dr. Szlyk